MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA v 1. ) MOHD ZAID BIN IBRAHIM 2. ) Liew Teck Huat 3. ) Rueben Mathiavaranam

wa-17d-6-02-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 6 October 2025 • WA-17D-6-02/2024

Catchwords

LEGAL PROFESSION: Advocates and solicitors – Disciplinary proceedings – Complaint to Disciplinary Board – Disciplinary Board of the view matter can be dealt with summarily. The Disciplinary Board dismissed the complaint – Appeal – Complainant pending appeal application, an abuse of the process of the court - Sections 99, 100, and 103E, of Legal Profession Act 1976 – Rules 18 of the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978.

Practice Areas

LEGAL PROFESSION: Advocates and solicitors

Judges (1)

Amarjeet Singh a/l Serjit Singh Delivered

Parties (4)

MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA Appellant Liew Teck Huat Respondent Mohd Zaid bin Ibrahim Respondent Rueben Mathiavaranam Respondent

Case Significance

MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA v 1. ) MOHD ZAID BIN IBRAHIM 2. ) Liew Teck Huat 3. ) ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 6, 2025 (citation: wa-17d-6-02-2024). The case was decided by Amarjeet Singh a/l Serjit Singh.

What was the outcome of MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA v 1. ) MOHD ZAID BIN IBRAHIM 2. ) Liew Teck Huat 3. ) ...?

MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA v 1. ) MOHD ZAID BIN IBRAHIM 2. ) Liew Teck Huat 3. ) ... is a High Court decision dated October 6, 2025. The case was heard by Amarjeet Singh a/l Serjit Singh. See the full judgment for details.