Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng
Catchwords
[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the Sessions Court (SC) that allowed the Respondent’s claim. [2] This Court has allowed the appeal in part. Only prayer 1(c) is allowed pertaining to the defect inspection cost of RM3710.00. The reasons are as deliberated. [3] For convenience, the parties are referred in their respective capacity at the Sessions Court. The Appellant is referred to as the Defendant and the Respondents are referred to as the Plaintiffs. [4] This Court finds that the appellate intervention is warranted only on the issue of the inspection report. As such, the appeal is allowed in part only. The rest of the Order of the SCJ is affirmed.
Practice Areas
1 This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the Sessions Court (SC) that allowed the Respondent’s claim. 2 This Court has allowed the appeal in part. Only prayer 1(c) is allowed pertaining to the defect inspection cost of RM3710.00. The reasons are as deliberated. 3 For convenience, the parties are referred in their respective capacity at the Sessions Court. The Appellant is referred to as the Defendant and the Respondents are referred to as the Plaintiffs. 4 This Court finds that the appellate intervention is warranted only on the issue of the inspection report. As such, the appeal is allowed in part only. The rest of the Order of the SCJ is affirmed.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 20, 2025 (citation: wa-12bncvc-61-05-2024). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.
Key issues: [1] This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the Sessions Court (SC) that allowed the Respondent’s claim..
What was the outcome of Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng?
Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng is a High Court decision dated March 20, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.