1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAHIR BIN KHALID 2. ) MOHAMMAD RAZEEN BIN KHALID 3. ) ACTIVE8 HIM SPORTS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) KO KANGMIN 2. ) HIM SPORTS SDN. BHD.
Catchwords
Whether the SCJ erred in law and fact by deciding to allow the following subparagraphs in paragraph 44 of the SoC – (a) a declaration that the contract for the sale of P2 between D3 and P2 has been terminated by P1; (b) a declaration that D3 be struck out (dibatalkan); (e) the Defendants shall jointly and severally pay damages in the sum of RM342,771.00 to P1 and/ or P2 immediately; and (f) interest on the said amount of damages at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until full and final settlement Whether the SCJ erred in law and fact by deciding to allow the following subparagraphs in paragraph 100 of the SoC – (a) D1 and D2 to return and deliver the PE as stated in Annexure A to P1 and/ or P2, at the address given by P1, within seven days from the date of judgment; (b) D1 and D2 are liable to pay for the costs of delivery of the PE stated in Annexure A; (d) damages in the sum of RM5,000.00 for detinue; and (e) interest at the rate of 5% per annum on the sum as stated in subparagraph (b) from the date of filing of the suit until full settlement Whether the SCJ erred in law and fact by deciding that the Defendants had failed, on a balance of probabilities, to prove their counterclaim against P1
Practice Areas
Whether the SCJ erred in law and fact by deciding to allow the following subparagraphs in paragraph 44 of the SoC – (a) a declaration that the contract for the sale of P2 between D3 and P2 has been terminated by P1; (b) a declaration that D3 be struck out (dibatalkan); (e) the Defendants shall jointly and severally pay damages in the sum of RM342,771.00 to P1 and/ or P2 immediately; and (f) interest on the said amount of damages at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until full and final settlement Whether the SCJ erred in law and fact by deciding to allow the following subparagraphs in paragraph 100 of the SoC – (a) D1 and D2 to return and deliver the PE as stated in Annexure A to P1 and/ or P2, at the address given by P1, within seven days from the date of judgment; (b) D1 and D2 are liable to pay for the costs of delivery of the PE stated in Annexure A; (d) damages in the sum of RM5,000.00 for detinue; and (e) interest at the rate of 5% per annum on the sum as stated in subparagraph (b) from the date of filing of the suit until full settlement Whether the SCJ erred in law and fact by deciding that the Defendants had failed, on a balance of probabilities, to prove their counterclaim against P1
Judges (1)
Case Significance
1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAHIR BIN KHALID 2. ) MOHAMMAD RAZEEN BIN KHALID 3. ) ACTIVE8 ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 11, 2025 (citation: wa-12bncvc-34-02-2024). The case was decided by Aliza binti Sulaiman.
Key issues: Whether the SCJ erred in law and fact by deciding to allow the following subparagraphs in paragraph 44 of the SoC –.
What was the outcome of 1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAHIR BIN KHALID 2. ) MOHAMMAD RAZEEN BIN KHALID 3. ) ACTIVE8 ...?
1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAHIR BIN KHALID 2. ) MOHAMMAD RAZEEN BIN KHALID 3. ) ACTIVE8 ... is a High Court decision dated March 11, 2025. The case was heard by Aliza binti Sulaiman. See the full judgment for details.