SILVERY DRAGON PRESTRESSED MATERIALS CO., LTD. TIANJIN. v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) MENTERI KEWANGAN 3. ) MENTERI KANAN PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI

w-01a-407-06-2024 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 14 January 2026 • W-01(A)-407-06/2024 • 43 min read

1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

judicial review - whether the Respondents’ failure to disclose the detailed methodology and figures underpinning the dumping margin prior to the Final Determination was lawful, and whether the use of erroneous figures in the margin calculation renders the determination invalid. - Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties Regulations 1994 ("CADDR 1994") - principles of procedural fairness and natural Justice - Duty to Disclose Detailed Dumping Margin Calculation Sheet – Procedural Impropriety

Practice Areas

judicial review

Judges (3)

Choo Kah Sing Coram Ong Chee Kwan Delivered Wong Kian Kheong Coram

Counsel (6)

Jabatan Peguam Negara Firm Lim Chee Wee Partnership Firm Dato' Lim Chee Wee Counsel Appellant Fauziah Daud Counsel Respondent Kelvin Seah Khye Jie Counsel Appellant Rahazlan Affandi Abdul Rahim Counsel Respondent

Parties (4)

Kerajaan Malaysia Respondent MENTERI KANAN PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI Respondent MENTERI KEWANGAN Respondent SILVERY DRAGON PRESTRESSED MATERIALS CO., LTD. TIANJIN Appellant

Case Significance

SILVERY DRAGON PRESTRESSED MATERIALS CO., LTD. TIANJIN. v 1. ) Kerajaan Malay... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated January 14, 2026 (citation: w-01a-407-06-2024). <p>Silvery Dragon, a Chinese PC strand manufacturer, challenged the imposition of 9.47% anti-dumping duties on its exports to Malaysia, arguing the investigating authority failed to disclose its dumping margin calculation methodology and used erroneous figures. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and quashed the anti-dumping duties, finding procedural impropriety, computational errors, and contradictory material injury findings.</p> The panel comprised Choo Kah Sing, Ong Chee Kwan and Wong Kian Kheong, with Ong Chee Kwan delivering the judgment. Counsel appearing: Dato' Lim Chee Wee (counsel for appellant), Fauziah Daud (counsel for respondent), Kelvin Seah Khye Jie (counsel for appellant), Rahazlan Affandi Abdul Rahim (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Silvery Dragon, a Chinese PC strand manufacturer, challenged the imposition of 9.47% anti-dumping duties on its exports to Malaysia, arguing the investigating authority failed to disclose its dumping margin calculation methodology and used erroneous figures. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and quashed the anti-dumping duties, finding procedural impropriety, computational errors, and contradictory material injury findings.

What was the outcome of SILVERY DRAGON PRESTRESSED MATERIALS CO., LTD. TIANJIN. v 1. ) Kerajaan Malay...?

<p>Silvery Dragon, a Chinese PC strand manufacturer, challenged the imposition of 9.47% anti-dumping duties on its exports to Malaysia, arguing the in...

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)

[2025] 1 CLJ 681