Pendakwa Raya v FAIRUZZAMANI BIN HAMID

ra-41lb-12-12-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 22 November 2023 • RA-41LB-12-12/2022 • 26 min read
25 cases cited (0 SG, 25 foreign)

Outcome

The correct approach is therefore not whether the decision is wrong but whether the conviction is safe. See, Mohammad Husain v. Emperor AIR [1945] Nag 441; Zahari bin Yeop Baai v. PP [1980] 1 MLJ 160.”.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ra-41lb-12-12-2022). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Rayuan Pendakwa Raya terhadap keputusan lepas dan bebas responden di bawah Seksyen 6 Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952. Samaada pihak pendakwaan berjaya membuktikan suatu kes prima facie. Keraguan mengenai integriti dan identiti barang kes dadah. Terdapat perbezaan serta barang kes dadah yang ditimbang oleh pihak polis dan berat yang dinyatakan dalam laporan kimia. Percanggahan keterangan SP1 dan SP4 adalah serius dan meterial. Kegagalan memanggil saksi penting mewujudkan lompang dalam kes pendakwaan.

Practice Areas

Criminal Law Criminal Procedure

Judges (1)

Arik Sanusi bin Yeop Johari Delivered

Counsel (4)

Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri Perlis Firm Rahmat & Mahsuri Firm Mohd Izham bin Ali Counsel Prosecution Rahamathullah Bin Baharuddin Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Pendakwa Raya Appellant Fairuzzamani bin Hamid Respondent

Cases Cited (25)

MY (25)
[1956] MLJ 237 [1967] 1 MLJ 220 [1969] 2 MLJ 209 [1980] 1 MLJ 160 [1981] 1 MLJ 84 [1989] 2 MLJ 110 [1995] 3 MLJ 395 [1996] 4 CLJ 545 [1998] 4 CLJ 209 [2003] 1 CLJ 734 [2004] 4 CLJ 551 [2004] 4 MLJ 489 [2004] 6 AMR 189 [2005] 1 CLJ 389 [2005] 2 MLJ 301 [2005] 6 MLJ 393 [2008] 4 MLJ 223 [2009] 5 MLJ 301 [2011] 1 CLJ 805 [2011] 4 CLJ 113 [2012] 4 MLJ 149 [2013] 8 CLJ 800 [2014] 4 MLJ 875 [2020] 5 MLJ 149 [2020] 9 CLJ 151

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ra-41lb-12-12-2022)