Vincent Anak Marcos v Pendakwa Raya

q-06am-21-08-2018 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 25 April 2022 • Q-06A(M)-21-08/2018 • 92 min read
61 cases cited (3 SG, 58 foreign)

Outcome

Conclusion [139] In conclusion, in the light of the foregoing analysis and reasons, we found upon the totality of the evidence, that the conviction of the appellant is safe.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) (q-06am-21-08-2018). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Section 332 of the CPC-Opinion evidence of an expert-Section 45(1) Evidence Act 1950-Intention to kill-Section 300 of the Penal Code-Direct eyewitness-Inconsistent and contradictory statements-Cautioned statements-Bare denial-

Practice Areas

Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Evidence

Judges (3)

Gunalan a/l Muniandy Coram Lee Swee Seng Coram Supang Lian Delivered

Parties (2)

Pendakwa Raya Respondent Vincent Anak Marcos Appellant

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
Penal Code (Cap 574)
s 300 s 302

Cases Cited (61)

SG (1)
[1998] SGCA 48
SLR (2)
[1998] 3 SLR 593 [1998] 3 SLR(R) 205
UK (12)
[1899] 2 Ch 13 [1955] 2 All ER 899 [1955] 2 QB 497 [1955] 3 WLR 369 [1968] 1 All ER 683 [1968] 2 QB 77 [1968] 2 WLR 623 [1972] AC 100 [1975] 1 All ER 70 [1975] 2 WLR 56 [1975] QB 834 [2015] UKPC 9
MY (46)
[1963] MLJ 160 [1966] 2 MLJ 119 [1967] 2 MLJ 35 [1977] 1 MLJ 174 [1982] 2 MLJ 273 [1982] 2 MLJ 324 [1984] 1 CLJ 80 [1984] 2 MLJ 19 [1991] 3 CLJ 2387 [1991] 3 CLJ 2414 [1991] 3 MLJ 314 [1991] 3 MLJ 423 [1992] 4 CLJ 2028 [1994] 2 MLJ 576 [1996] 1 CLJ 705 [1996] 1 MLJ 209 [1999] 2 CLJ 215 [1999] 2 MLJ 1 [1999] 4 CLJ 215 [1999] 4 MLJ 497 [2000] 2 AMR 89 [2003] 1 CLJ 734 [2003] 125 CLJ 734 [2003] 2 AMR 89 [2003] 2 MLJ 65 [2004] 4 CLJ 309 [2004] 6 AMR 825 [2005] 1 AMR 321 [2005] 1 CLJ 389 [2005] 1 CLJ 85 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2005] 2 MLJ 301 [2005] 5 MLJ 409 [2005] 6 AMR 203 [2005] 6 MLJ 393 [2006] 1 CLJ 457 [2008] MLJU 946 [2009] MLJU 1828 [2011] 2 MLJ 321 [2011] 4 CLJ 758 [2020] 5 MLJ 442 [2020] 8 CLJ 306 [2022] 1 CLJ 673 [2022] 1 MLJ 479 [2023] 4 MLJ 929 [2023] MLJU 1352

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (q-06am-21-08-2018)