GOMATHY A/P VIJAYAN v 1. ) ELANKOVAN A/L RUKMINIE @ RAMANATHI 2. ) SELVANAYAGI A/P CHILLAYAH

pa-22ncvc-117-06-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 June 2025 • PA-22NCvC-117-06/2021 • 19 min read
2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Outcome

Accordingly, I allow the Plaintiff’s alternative prayer as follows: [a] The Plaintiff’s claim in paragraph 22(i) of the Amended Statement of Claim is allowed, and the Defendants, jointly and/or severally, are ordered to refund the deposit sum of RM200,000.00 to the Plaintiff within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Judgment.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (pa-22ncvc-117-06-2021). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (3)

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)
[2008] 5 CLJ 441 [2017] 5 CLJ 418

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (pa-22ncvc-117-06-2021)