PUBLIC BANK BERHAD v 1. ) GOH GIAP PING 2. ) LEE JOO KEAT 3. ) FORM RITE (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD

pa-22ncc-21-03-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 June 2025 • PA-22NCC-21-03/2024

Catchwords

Claim by bank (plaintiff) against guarantor (defendant) in connection with loan facilities granted to borrower company – Whether the bank must exhaust other remedies before suing on the guarantee – Whether the guarantee was signed by the defendant – Whether the defendant’s signature on the guarantee was forged – Whether the defendant was still a director of the borrower company at the time of the execution of the guarantee.

Practice Areas

Claim by bank (plaintiff) against guarantor (defendant) in connection with loan facilities granted to borrower company

Judges (1)

Quay Chew Soon Delivered

Parties (4)

FORM RITE Sdn Bhd Defendant PUBLIC BANK BERHAD Plaintiff Goh Giap Ping Defendant Lee Joo Keat Defendant

Case Significance

PUBLIC BANK BERHAD v 1. ) GOH GIAP PING 2. ) LEE JOO KEAT 3. ) FORM RITE (MAL... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 23, 2025 (citation: pa-22ncc-21-03-2024). The case was decided by Quay Chew Soon.

What was the outcome of PUBLIC BANK BERHAD v 1. ) GOH GIAP PING 2. ) LEE JOO KEAT 3. ) FORM RITE (MAL...?

PUBLIC BANK BERHAD v 1. ) GOH GIAP PING 2. ) LEE JOO KEAT 3. ) FORM RITE (MAL... is a High Court decision dated June 23, 2025. The case was heard by Quay Chew Soon. See the full judgment for details.