Ivory Associates Sdn Bhd v AST MACHINERY (M) SDN BHD

pa-12bncvc-6-12-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 November 2025 • PA-12BNCvC-6-12/2022

Catchwords

1. Appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge (SCJ) that allows the Respondent’s claim for outstanding rental in the sum of RM885,052.01 arising from the rental of three (3) tower cranes (contract law). The SCJ also dismissed the Appellant’s counterclaim. 2. This Court is of the view that there is no error of law and facts from the decision of the SCJ. The appeal is dismissed.

Practice Areas

1. Appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge (SCJ) that allows the Respondent’s claim for outstanding rental in the sum of RM885,052.01 arising from the rental of three (3) tower cranes (contract law). The SCJ also dismissed the Appellant’s counterclaim. 2. This Court is of the view that there is no error of law and facts from the decision of the SCJ. The appeal is dismissed.

Judges (1)

Suzana binti Muhamad Said Delivered

Parties (2)

AST MACHINERY Sdn Bhd Respondent Ivory Associates Sdn Bhd Appellant

Case Significance

Ivory Associates Sdn Bhd v AST MACHINERY (M) SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 16, 2025 (citation: pa-12bncvc-6-12-2022). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.

What was the outcome of Ivory Associates Sdn Bhd v AST MACHINERY (M) SDN BHD?

Ivory Associates Sdn Bhd v AST MACHINERY (M) SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated November 16, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.