MANIMARAN A/L VALAKRISHNAN v 1. ) RAVIVARMA A/L SHANMUGAM 2. ) THAVANESAN A/L PANCHALINGAM 3. ) THIRUCHELVAM A/L SUBRAMANIAM 4. ) NIMELAN A/L KADIRA VELU 5. ) NANDA KUMARI A/P MUTHU 6. ) BASKARAN NAIR A/L CHINDAN NAIR 7. ) MAHENDRAN A/L T. SINNADURAI 8. ) RAJAGOPAL A/L RATNAM 9. ) VICKNESH ANAND A/L BASKARAN NAIR 10. ) JEYA DAS A/L S. MAGHASON 11. ) MAHENDRANATHAN A/L THURAIAPPAH 12. ) GRAHAM RICHARD PHILIP BROWN 13. ) INDRAN A/L MANIAM 14. ) VOON CHEE MAN 15. ) Alan D'cruz

na-22ncvc-32-06-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 November 2025 • NA-22NCvC-32-06/2022 • 15 min read

Outcome

Berdasarkan alasan-alasan di atas, Mahkamah memutuskan bahawa tuntutan Plaintif ditolak dengan kos.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (na-22ncvc-32-06-2022). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (16)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (na-22ncvc-32-06-2022)