HABIBUL 'AJMI BIN MANGAAR PENCELAH 1. ) MUHAMMAD MUNIR BIN MANGGAR 2. ) KAMISAH BINTI ABAS 3. ) MUHAMMAD MANNAN BIN MANGGAR 4. ) SITI MUNIRAH BINTI MANGGAR 5. ) MUHAMMAD OMAR FAROUK BIN MANGGAR 6. ) MUHAMMAD FAIZ BIN MANGGAR 7. ) MUHAMMAD FU'AD BIN MANGGAR

ma-24ncvc-28-01-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 December 2025 • MA-24NCvC-28-01/2024 • 12 min read
2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Outcome

As for the reasons why I granted the order for reimbursement of costs, it is not in dispute that the Administrator has expanded his time and money in the administration of his late father's estate.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ma-24ncvc-28-01-2024). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

(1) Is the Administrator entitled to the 3% commission pursuant to Section 43 of the PAA? (2) Whether the Administrator is entitled to all costs incurred and to be incurred in the administration of the estate under Section 44 of the PAA?

Practice Areas

Probate & Administration

Judges (1)

Isa Aziz Ibrahim Delivered

Counsel (4)

MAHAIYUDDIN, AZLIFA & CO. Firm Sault Scott & Co. Firm Mahaiyuddin Bin Musa Counsel Applicant Muhammad Farhan Mirza bin Azme Counsel Intervener

Parties (8)

Habibul 'ajmi bin Mangaar Applicant Kamisah binti Abas Intervener Muhammad Faiz bin Manggar Intervener Muhammad Fu'ad bin Manggar Intervener Muhammad Mannan bin Manggar Intervener Muhammad Munir bin Manggar Intervener Muhammad Omar Farouk bin Manggar Intervener Siti Munirah binti Manggar Intervener

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)
[1998] 4 CLJ 81 [2018] 6 MLRH 273

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ma-24ncvc-28-01-2024)