Pendakwa Raya v JOHANIZAM BIN JOHARI

ka-45b-1-05-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 August 2025 • KA-45B-1-05/2022 • 63 min read
34 cases cited (1 SG, 33 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Illustrates the assessment of the partial defences to murder of sudden fight, grave and sudden provocation and intoxication under the Penal Code, and the approach to imposing the death penalty as an exceptional sentence on a conviction under section 302.

This High Court decision sets out the grounds for convicting an accused of murder under section 302 of the Penal Code and for imposing the death penalty. The accused was charged with murdering a man at a house in Kedah on a morning in February 2021. At the close of the prosecution case the court found that a prima facie case had been established and called on the accused to enter his defence. The accused gave sworn evidence and called no other witnesses. His defences were that he had acted in private defence, that he was so intoxicated as to be incapable of knowing what he was doing, and that the killing occurred in a sudden fight (sudden fight) and under grave and sudden provocation (bangkitan marah yang besar dan mengejut), invoking Exceptions 1 and 4 to section 300 of the Penal Code and attributing his loss of control to insults said to have been directed at his race and religion by the deceased. At the close of the defence case the court held that the accused had failed to raise any reasonable doubt and had failed to make out the pleaded defences on the balance of probabilities. It found in particular that the injuries had been inflicted to the head with a weapon, that the accused had tried to hide the weapon and to flee, and that the offence was committed while he was under supervision, and it noted that he had shown no remorse. Concluding that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, the court convicted the accused of murder. Treating the matter as an exceptional case, the court imposed the sentence of death by hanging. The judgment is a detailed illustration of how the courts assess the partial defences to murder of sudden fight, provocation and intoxication, and of the approach to sentencing in a murder conviction.

What defences did the accused raise to the murder charge?

The accused relied on private defence, intoxication amounting to incapacity, and a sudden fight with grave and sudden provocation under Exceptions 1 and 4 to section 300 of the Penal Code, said to arise from insults to his race and religion. The court held he had failed to make out any of these defences on the balance of probabilities.

What sentence did the court impose?

Having convicted the accused of murder under section 302 of the Penal Code and treating the matter as an exceptional case, the court imposed the sentence of death by hanging, and the accused filed an appeal against the decision.

Statutes Cited

s 182A
Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (34)

SG (1)
[2012] SGCA 47
MY (30)
[1950] MLJ 57 [1954] 1 MLJ 86 [1955] 1 MLJ 24 [1956] 1 MLJ 237 [1960] MLJ 296 [1962] 1 MLJ 307 [1963] 1 MLJ 263 [1976] 2 MLJ 256 [1978] 1 MLJ 159 [1981] 1 MLJ 315 [1982] 1 MLJ 24 [1988] 1 CLJ 143 [1988] 1 MLJ 251 [2005] 1 CLJ 85 [2007] 2 CLJ 229 [2007] 2 MLJ 130 [2007] 2 MLJ 505 [2013] 3 MLJ 773 [2015] 4 CLJ 149 [2015] 4 MLJ 58 [2017] 1 MLJ 549 [2017] 3 MLJ 141 [2020] 5 MLJ 442 [2022] 1 CLJ 673 [2022] 6 MLJ 118 [2024] 4 CLJ 823 [2024] 4 MLJ 796 [2024] MLJU 154 [2025] 1 CLJ 517 [2025] 4 CLJ 837
IN (3)
AIR 1955 SC 807 AIR 1966 SC 1874 AIR 1976 SC 2499

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ka-45b-1-05-2022)