Pendakwa Raya v MUHAMAD SYAFIQ BIN ROSLI

ka-45a-27-06-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 2 June 2025 • KA-45A-27-06/2023 • 51 min read
32 cases cited (1 SG, 31 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Illustrates the proof required to establish trafficking in a very large quantity of cannabis and the exercise of the sentencing discretion under the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 in a case the court regarded as meriting the death sentence.

This High Court decision at Alor Setar concerns a prosecution for trafficking in a very large quantity of cannabis, and the imposition of the death sentence following a full trial. The accused was charged under seksyen 39B Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 (section 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952), punishable under section 39B(2), for trafficking in 507,965.60 grams of cannabis intercepted at a set of traffic lights in Alor Setar, Kedah, in the early morning. The prosecution's case, built on the evidence of six witnesses, was that acting on information about a large consignment of cannabis expected to move through the area in a multi-purpose vehicle, a narcotics team mounted an operation that, after an initial stand-down and the summoning of technical assistance, led to the interception and the seizure of the drugs. The questions the court had to decide were whether the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and, on conviction, what the just sentence should be, the latter engaging the discretion now available under the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023. Applying the established principles on possession, knowledge and the trafficking presumption, and the prima-facie-case threshold drawn from authorities such as Balachandran v PP, the court was satisfied that the prosecution had established the ingredients of trafficking beyond reasonable doubt and convicted the accused. On sentence, having weighed the gravity of the offence and the enormous quantity of cannabis involved against the mitigating considerations, the court determined that this was a case warranting the ultimate penalty and sentenced the accused to death. The judgment is a useful illustration of the proof required to establish trafficking in a very large quantity of cannabis and of the exercise of the sentencing discretion under the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 in a case the court regarded as meriting the death sentence.

What was the charge and the quantity of drugs?

The accused was charged under section 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 with trafficking in 507,965.60 grams of cannabis intercepted during a police operation at traffic lights in Alor Setar, Kedah.

What was the outcome on conviction and sentence?

The court found the prosecution had proved the ingredients of trafficking beyond reasonable doubt and convicted the accused, and, exercising the sentencing discretion under the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, determined that the case warranted the death sentence and imposed it.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (32)

SLR (1)
[1995] 2 SLR 424
UK (1)
[1952] AC 525
MY (30)
[1956] MLJ 237 [1966] 1 MLJ 197 [1966] 2 MLJ 195 [1980] 2 MLJ 13 [1980] 2 MLJ 195 [1981] 1 MLJ 64 [1982] 1 MLJ 83 [1995] 4 MLRH 256 [1996] 2 CLJ 96 [2001] 3 AMR 3253 [2001] 4 CLJ 9 [2002] 6 MLJ 153 [2002] 8 CLJ 846 [2004] 4 CLJ 551 [2005] 1 CLJ 85 [2006] 1 CLJ 457 [2008] MLJU 667 [2011] 1 CLJ 870 [2011] 4 CLJ 113 [2011] 8 CLJ 406 [2011] MLJU 1566 [2014] 6 CLJ 979 [2015] MLJU 2234 [2018] 6 CLJ 133 [2019] 6 MLJ 231 [2021] 2 MLJ 451 [2021] 7 CLJ 524 [2024] 6 MLJ 773 [2024] 9 CLJ 224 [2024] MLJU 1445

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ka-45a-27-06-2023)