AMIRUL SYAHMI BIN ROSLEE v 1. ) LEFTENAN KOLONEL MUHAMMAD BASHIRUDDIN BIN JAMALUDIN, PEGAWAI MEMERINTAH, BATALION KEENAM REJIMEN ASKAR DIRAJA 2. ) BRIGEDIER JENERAL SAIFUL BAHARI BIN ZAINOL, PENGARAH INFANTRI, MARKAS TENTERA DARAT (MKTD) 3. ) ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
AMIRUL SYAHMI BIN ROSLEE v 1. ) LEFTENAN KOLONEL MUHAMMAD BASHIRUDDIN BIN JAM... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 22, 2025 (citation: ka-25-14-10-2024). <p>A Malaysian Army Captain sought judicial review to quash his transfer order from Kedah to Sabah and to invalidate related disciplinary actions including a 'Loose Arrest' and AWOL charge. The court dismissed the application, finding that military transfer orders are non-justiciable management prerogatives, the disciplinary challenge was premature as the applicant failed to exhaust the mandatory domestic remedy under Section 130 of the Armed Forces Act 1972, and the applicant improperly raised The case was decided by John Lee Kien How @ Mohammad Johan Lee. Counsel appearing: Irwan Shah Asri (counsel for applicant), Norshuhada Mohd Yatim (counsel for respondent).
Summary
A Malaysian Army Captain sought judicial review to quash his transfer order from Kedah to Sabah and to invalidate related disciplinary actions including a 'Loose Arrest' and AWOL charge. The court dismissed the application, finding that military transfer orders are non-justiciable management prerogatives, the disciplinary challenge was premature as the applicant failed to exhaust the mandatory domestic remedy under Section 130 of the Armed Forces Act 1972, and the applicant improperly raised new factual allegations during oral submissions.
What was the outcome of AMIRUL SYAHMI BIN ROSLEE v 1. ) LEFTENAN KOLONEL MUHAMMAD BASHIRUDDIN BIN JAM...?
<p>A Malaysian Army Captain sought judicial review to quash his transfer order from Kedah to Sabah and to invalidate related disciplinary actions incl...