YONG SHUI TIAN v MAJLIS PERBANDARAN LANGKAWI BANDARAYA PELANCONGAN
Outcome
K-01(NCVC)(W)-36-01/2024 38 G. Decision [91] Therefore, for all the reasons above, we give judgment as regards liability as follows: (a) The appellant’s appeal is allowed; and (b) The respondent is wholly liable for the injuries sustained by the appellant as a result of the coconut tree falling on him at Pantai Chenang beach, Langkawi on 09 January 2019. [92] The High Court’s judgment dated 11 December 2023 is set aside.
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (3)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
A significant illustration of a local authority's statutory duty under section 101 of the Local Government Act 1976 to maintain and make safe trees in public places, and of appellate correction where a trial court has wrongly absolved the authority of liability for injuries caused by a falling tree.
This Court of Appeal decision concerns the liability of a local authority for injuries caused by a falling tree on a public beach. The appellant suffered serious injuries, resulting in paralysis of the lower half of his body, when a coconut tree unexpectedly fell on him while he was on Pantai Chenang beach in Langkawi in January 2019. He sued the respondent, the local authority for Langkawi established under the Local Government Act 1976, in negligence and for breach of statutory duty, contending that it owed a duty under section 101 of that Act to control, supervise and maintain the trees on the beach, and to trim or remove trees that endangered public safety. The High Court had dismissed the claim with costs. On appeal the Court of Appeal took a different view. Examining the statutory duties under section 101(b), (c) and (cc)(i) of the Local Government Act 1976 and the evidence about the condition of the trees and the authority's management of them, it concluded that the respondent was liable. It allowed the appeal and held the respondent wholly liable for the injuries the appellant sustained as a result of the coconut tree falling on him. It set aside the High Court's judgment and, because the High Court had not adjudicated the claim for damages, remitted the assessment of damages to be heard before a different judge at the High Court, ordering costs of RM30,000 here and below, subject to allocatur. The court's decision underscores that the statutory responsibilities of a local authority for public spaces are not merely administrative but can found civil liability to a member of the public injured by a hazard the authority ought to have addressed, and that an appellate court will intervene where the trial court has failed to give those duties their proper effect. The judgment is a significant illustration of a local authority's statutory duty to maintain and make safe trees in public places, and of appellate correction where a trial court has wrongly absolved the authority of liability.
Summary
The appellant suffered paralysis when a coconut tree fell on him at Pantai Chenang beach, Langkawi in 2019, and sued the local authority for negligence and breach of statutory duty under the Local Government Act 1976. The High Court dismissed the claim, but the Court of Appeal reversed, finding the local authority had a statutory duty under Section 101 to supervise and maintain trees in the beach area regardless of land ownership. The case was remitted to a different High Court judge for assessment of damages.
What duty did the local authority owe, and did it breach it?
The court held that the local authority owed duties under section 101(b), (c) and (cc)(i) of the Local Government Act 1976 to control, supervise and maintain the trees on Pantai Chenang beach and to trim or remove trees endangering public safety, and that on the evidence it was wholly liable for the injuries caused when a coconut tree fell on the appellant.
What did the Court of Appeal order?
It allowed the appeal, held the respondent wholly liable, set aside the High Court's dismissal of the claim, and, as damages had not been adjudicated, remitted the assessment of damages to a different judge at the High Court, ordering costs of RM30,000 here and below.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (34)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (k-01ncvcw-36-01-2024)