PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) WAN AHMAD ZAMHARIRIE BIN WAN MUSTAFHA 2. ) MOHD ASHRUL BIN GHAZALI
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) WAN AHMAD ZAMHARIRIE BIN WAN MUSTAF... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 8, 2026 (citation: jb-45a-16-11-2021). <p>Two accused were jointly charged with trafficking 3,264g of methamphetamine under Section 39B(1)(a) read with Section 34 of the Penal Code. At the end of the prosecution case, the 2nd accused (Mohd Ashrul) was acquitted as the prosecution failed to prove common intention — he was merely a passenger with no evidence of pre-arranged plan, his DNA was not found on the drugs, and there was no evidence linking him to knowledge or control of the drugs hidden in the lorry's tool box.</p> The case was decided by Kalyana Kumar Sockalingam. Counsel appearing: Muhammad bin Abd Kadir (counsel accused), Siti Asmah binti Zainal Ariffin (prosecution counsel).
Key issues: Seksyen 39B(1)(A) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952..
Summary
Two accused were jointly charged with trafficking 3,264g of methamphetamine under Section 39B(1)(a) read with Section 34 of the Penal Code. At the end of the prosecution case, the 2nd accused (Mohd Ashrul) was acquitted as the prosecution failed to prove common intention — he was merely a passenger with no evidence of pre-arranged plan, his DNA was not found on the drugs, and there was no evidence linking him to knowledge or control of the drugs hidden in the lorry's tool box.
What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) WAN AHMAD ZAMHARIRIE BIN WAN MUSTAF...?
<p>Two accused were jointly charged with trafficking 3,264g of methamphetamine under Section 39B(1)(a) read with Section 34 of the Penal Code. At the ...