LIM CHIEW MING v LIM CHIN ENG

ja-24ncvc-1160-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 1 July 2025 • JA-24NCvC-1160-09/2024 • 11 min read
1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Outcome

Therefore, I allowed the Enclosure 1 for prayers 1, 3, 6 and 8. I further ordered the termination of the co-proprietorship and further directed a buy-out mechanism whereby the Respondent was to purchase the Applicant’s 50% interest at RM700,000.00 within six (6) months, failing which the Property was to be sold on the open market at the prevailing market value. Each party bear its own costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ja-24ncvc-1160-09-2024). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Illustrates how the court terminates a co-proprietorship of land under sections 145 and 417 of the National Land Code, ordering a buy-out of one co-owner's share at a determined price with a fallback of an open-market sale where the co-owners cannot agree.

This High Court decision at Johor Bahru concerns the termination of a co-proprietorship of land held by two co-owners in equal shares. The applicant, who held a 50% interest in a property in Johor Bahru together with the respondent, brought an originating summons under sections 145 and 417 of the National Land Code, seeking the termination of the co-proprietorship and consequential orders for the disposal of the property. The applicant sought, in particular, that the property be sold, either immediately or within one year, at a price not less than RM1,400,000, and the court had to decide how best to bring the co-ownership to an end while doing justice between the two co-owners. Section 145 of the National Land Code addresses the rights of co-proprietors, and the court's task where co-owners cannot agree is to fashion a fair mechanism for realising or dividing their interests. The court considered whether it should direct the applicant to sell her 50% interest to the respondent at a fixed price, or order the property to be sold on the open market at a price not less than the figure contended for. Upon consideration of the affidavits and written submissions, the court ordered the termination of the co-proprietorship and directed a buy-out mechanism under which the respondent was to purchase the applicant's 50% interest for RM700,000 within six months, failing which the property was to be sold on the open market at the prevailing market value. Each party was to bear its own costs. The judgment is a useful illustration of how the court terminates a co-proprietorship under the National Land Code by ordering a buy-out at a determined price with a fallback of an open-market sale. The judgment reflects the court's practical concern to achieve a clean severance of the co-owners' interests while giving the co-owner who wishes to retain the property a fair opportunity to buy the other out at a determined value, resorting to an open-market sale only if that opportunity is not taken up, so that neither co-owner is locked indefinitely into an unwanted joint ownership.

How did the court terminate the co-proprietorship?

The court ordered the termination of the co-proprietorship under sections 145 and 417 of the National Land Code and directed a buy-out mechanism under which the respondent was to purchase the applicant's 50% interest for RM700,000 within six months, failing which the property was to be sold on the open market at the prevailing market value, each party bearing its own costs.

What options did the court weigh for realising the co-owners' interests?

The court weighed directing a sale of one co-owner's 50% interest to the other at a fixed price against ordering an open-market sale at a price not less than the figure contended for, and settled on a buy-out at a determined price with an open-market sale as the fallback if the buy-out did not proceed.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)
[2022] 5 MLJ 690

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-24ncvc-1160-09-2024)