Tenaga Nasional Berhad v GOLDEN WOLF SDN. BHD
Catchwords
Accordingly, the Court finds the Plaintiff has proven its case, and the claim for total loss with interest is allowed as pleaded. Reference is made to Mahadev Shankar J’s article “Putting and Suggesting in Cross-Examination” (January 1984 MLJ xi). The absence of relevant witnesses, including Simon Lim, renders the letter as documentary hearsay (see: Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Haji Abd Razak v PP [2022] 1 CLJ 491 (COA)). The document was not verified by Yee Teck Wai or any TM legal representative. Its contents are inadmissible as proof under Part C of the CBODs.
Practice Areas
Accordingly, the Court finds the Plaintiff has proven its case, and the claim for total loss with interest is allowed as pleaded. Reference is made to Mahadev Shankar J’s article “Putting and Suggesting in Cross-Examination” (January 1984 MLJ xi). The absence of relevant witnesses, including Simon Lim, renders the letter as documentary hearsay (see: Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Haji Abd Razak v PP 2022 1 CLJ 491 (COA)). The document was not verified by Yee Teck Wai or any TM legal representative. Its contents are inadmissible as proof under Part C of the CBODs.
Case Significance
Tenaga Nasional Berhad v GOLDEN WOLF SDN. BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 27, 2025 (citation: ja-22ncvc-45-04-2021). The case was decided by Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor.
Key issues: Accordingly, the Court finds the Plaintiff has proven its case, and the claim for total loss with interest is allowed as pleaded..
What was the outcome of Tenaga Nasional Berhad v GOLDEN WOLF SDN. BHD?
Tenaga Nasional Berhad v GOLDEN WOLF SDN. BHD is a High Court decision dated January 27, 2025. The case was heard by Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor. See the full judgment for details.