COUNTRY GARDEN PACIFICVIEW SDN. BHD. v LIMKOKWING UNIVERSITY OF CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL SDN. BHD.

ja-22ncvc-175-12-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 February 2026 • JA-22NCvC-175-12/2021 • 24 min read
10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Outcome

(b) On the Defendant's Counterclaim – The Defendant's Counterclaim is dismissed in its entirety. (c) Costs of RM100,000.00 to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, subject to the allocatur fee.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ja-22ncvc-175-12-2021). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

• Contract – Sale and Purchase Agreement (Schedule H) – Statutory contract • Specific performance – Whether available – s.11(2) Specific Relief Act 1950 • Breach – Non-payment of balance purchase price • Termination – Whether purchaser can terminate upon own breach – No • Clause 11 SPA – Whether exclusive remedy – Permissive (“may”), not mandatory • Vacant possession – Validity – Deemed delivery • Late payment charges – Entitlement – 10% p.a. • Mitigation – No duty to terminate • Counterclaim – Refund – Dismissed • Held: SPA valid; specific performance granted

Practice Areas

Contract Remedies

Judges (1)

Noradura binti Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (5)

Izad Kazran & Co. Firm Siva Nada & Associates Firm Aleeya Elyana Counsel Plaintiff Lee Xin Yi Counsel Plaintiff Sivanesan a/l Nadarajah Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

COUNTRY GARDEN PACIFICVIEW Sdn Bhd Plaintiff LIMKOKWING UNIVERSITY OF CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL Sdn Bhd Defendant

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950
s 40
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)

Cases Cited (10)

MY (10)
[1987] 2 MLJ 1 [2012] 1 MLJ 761 [2015] 2 MLJ 441 [2016] 1 MLJ 464 [2016] 1 MLJ 764 [2017] 7 CLJ 450 [2021] 2 MLJ 374 [2021] MLJU 2225 [2022] 7 MLJ 293 [2025] 6 MLJ 327

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-22ncvc-175-12-2021)