1. ) MUHAMMAD IQMAL HAFIDZI BIN JAMALUDIN 2. ) UNICOM EVENT MARKETING v SYAMZY ADAM BIN SHAMSUDIN

ja-12b-28-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 February 2026 • JA-12B-28-05/2025 • 15 min read
2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

H. Catchwords Rayuan — Kemalangan jalan raya — Keterangan bercanggah — Bukti objektif — Gambar kerosakan kenderaan — Perlanggaran bahagian belakang — Penukaran lorong — Kebarangkalian versi — Liabiliti — Sumbang cuai — Pembahagian liabiliti 80:20 — Kuantum — Gangguan award — Laporan pakar terkini — Kecederaan kepala — Pengurangan gantirugi — Pertindanan award — Potongan 15% — Kos rayuan — Kejayaan separa — Kos terhad (50%).

Practice Areas

H. Catchwords Rayuan

Judges (1)

Manira binti Mohd Nor Delivered

Counsel (4)

Munjeet Waalib & Assoc. Firm Sri Habib Chambers Firm Munjeet Kaur a/p Waalib Singh Counsel Respondent Sri Wahyuni binti Habib Counsel Appellant

Parties (3)

Muhammad Iqmal Hafidzi bin Jamaludin Appellant Syamzy Adam bin Shamsudin Respondent Unicom Event Marketing Appellant

Case Significance

1. ) MUHAMMAD IQMAL HAFIDZI BIN JAMALUDIN 2. ) UNICOM EVENT MARKETING v SYAMZ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 23, 2026 (citation: ja-12b-28-05-2025). <p>A motorcycle rider was injured after colliding with the rear of a motor lorry on the North-South Expressway. The Sessions Court found the defendants 100% liable, but the defendants appealed on both liability and quantum. The High Court partially allowed the appeal, apportioning liability 80:20 (defendants:respondent) based on objective evidence of a rear impact, reducing the general damages award from RM180,000 to RM100,000, and applying a 15% deduction for overlapping awards.</p> The case was decided by Manira binti Mohd Nor. Counsel appearing: Munjeet Kaur a/p Waalib Singh (counsel for respondent), Sri Wahyuni binti Habib (counsel for appellant).

Summary

A motorcycle rider was injured after colliding with the rear of a motor lorry on the North-South Expressway. The Sessions Court found the defendants 100% liable, but the defendants appealed on both liability and quantum. The High Court partially allowed the appeal, apportioning liability 80:20 (defendants:respondent) based on objective evidence of a rear impact, reducing the general damages award from RM180,000 to RM100,000, and applying a 15% deduction for overlapping awards.

What was the outcome of 1. ) MUHAMMAD IQMAL HAFIDZI BIN JAMALUDIN 2. ) UNICOM EVENT MARKETING v SYAMZ...?

<p>A motorcycle rider was injured after colliding with the rear of a motor lorry on the North-South Expressway. The Sessions Court found the defendant...

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)
[1995] 3 CLJ 738 [1996] 1 CLJ 622