1. ) Mohd Nazri Bin Wahab 2. ) Wan Hamdan Bin Wan Hashim v Pendakwa Raya [Pendakwa Raya]
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
1. ) Mohd Nazri Bin Wahab 2. ) Wan Hamdan Bin Wan Hashim v Pendakwa Raya [Pen... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated May 26, 2025 (citation: j-05sh-567-11-2023). <p>Two co-accused were convicted of jointly trafficking 54.52g of monoacetylmorphines at a food court in Mersing, Johor, following an agent provocateur operation. The key issues included whether the agent provocateur's evidence was credible, whether the Judicial Commissioner erred in applying the statutory presumption under s.37(da), material discrepancies in the prosecution case, and whether the defence evidence was properly considered. The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed both appeals, fi The panel comprised Azmi bin Ariffin, Che Mohd Ruzima bin Ghazali and Choo Kah Sing, with Azmi bin Ariffin delivering the judgment. Counsel appearing: Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik (counsel for appellant), Ee Gen You (counsel for appellant), How May Ling (prosecution counsel), Kee Wei Lon (counsel for appellant), Mohd Fazaly Ali Bin Mohd Ghazaly (counsel for appellant).
Summary
Two co-accused were convicted of jointly trafficking 54.52g of monoacetylmorphines at a food court in Mersing, Johor, following an agent provocateur operation. The key issues included whether the agent provocateur's evidence was credible, whether the Judicial Commissioner erred in applying the statutory presumption under s.37(da), material discrepancies in the prosecution case, and whether the defence evidence was properly considered. The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed both appeals, finding the convictions and sentences of life imprisonment were safe.
What was the outcome of 1. ) Mohd Nazri Bin Wahab 2. ) Wan Hamdan Bin Wan Hashim v Pendakwa Raya [Pen...?
<p>Two co-accused were convicted of jointly trafficking 54.52g of monoacetylmorphines at a food court in Mersing, Johor, following an agent provocateu...