GOLDEN MINERALS SDN BHD v 1. ) THARMANANDAN A/L THANGAMUTHU 2. ) ALAM ETIKAA RESOURCES (M) SDN. BHD. 3. ) Dato' Rajagopal A/l Ramasamy

ca-22ncvc-44-11-2019 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 7 April 2025 • CA-22NCvC-44-11/2019 • 34 min read
10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Outcome

Perintah Akhir [54] Setelah meneliti keterangan saksi-saksi dan eksibit-eksibit yang dikemukakan Mahkamah akhirnya memutuskan bahawa tuntutan Plaintif adalah dibenarkan. Tuntutan balas Defendan adalah ditolak. Mahkamah memerintahkan gantirugi sejumlah RM 102,461.88 dengan kos RM 10,000.00 tertakluk kepada fi alokator.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ca-22ncvc-44-11-2019). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Perbicaraan penuh - Tuntutan berkenaan pelaksanaan writ penyitaan dan penjualan harta Plaintif - Harta-harta disita bukan milik penghutang penghakiman - Tuntutan dibenarkan dan gantirugi.

Practice Areas

Tort Damages

Judges (1)

Roslan bin Mat Nor Delivered

Counsel (4)

Amir & Rajpal Ghai Firm Thila Hong & Co Firm Ahmad Amir Mahmood Counsel Plaintiff Thilagam Panasamy Counsel Defendant

Parties (4)

ALAM ETIKAA RESOURCES Sdn Bhd Defendant GOLDEN MINERALS Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Dato' Rajagopal a/l Ramasamy Defendant Tharmanandan a/l Thangamuthu Defendant

Cases Cited (10)

UK (2)
[2013] 4 All ER 673 [2017] UKPC 32
MY (8)
[1985] 1 MLJ 157 [1989] 1 CLJ 192 [1989] 1 MLJ 318 [1998] 1 MLJ 697 [1998] 2 MLJ 425 [2021] 4 CLJ 821 [2023] 1 CLJ 323 [2024] 1 CLJ 110

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ca-22ncvc-44-11-2019)