YONG WAI KEE v Pendakwa Raya

ba-43-24-07-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 August 2025 • BA-43-24-07/2025 • 17 min read
4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Outcome

Dengan itu, permohonan semakan jaminan ini adalah ditolak.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ba-43-24-07-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Illustrates the operation of section 41B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 in withholding bail for the more serious drug offences, holding that an enhanced-penalty charge under section 39C(1) carrying imprisonment of more than five years falls within the category for which bail is not to be granted.

This High Court decision, on a criminal revision, concerns the availability of bail for a drug offence carrying an enhanced penalty for a repeat offender. The applicant had been charged under section 15(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 with administering dangerous drugs to himself without lawful authority, the charge being aggravated by two prior convictions for the same offence, so that he was liable to the increased penalty under section 39C(1) of the Act, namely imprisonment of not less than five and not more than seven years, together with whipping of up to three strokes and a period of supervision. The Sessions Court had refused bail, and the applicant sought revision, contending that the refusal was contrary to section 41B of the Act, which governs the grant of bail in dangerous-drugs cases, and raising the question whether section 41B applies to a charge under section 39C. The court examined the scheme of section 41B and the legislative purpose behind it, including the Minister's statement on its enactment that, in cases punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than five years, bail should not be granted. Because the section 39C(1) penalty exposed the applicant to imprisonment of more than five years, the court held that the offence fell within the category for which section 41B withholds bail, and that the Sessions Court's refusal of bail was consistent with section 41B. The court reasoned that the enhancement in section 39C is triggered by the applicant's record of prior admissions or convictions for self-administration, and that where that record raises the maximum term above five years the offence takes on the gravity that section 41B addresses, so that the discretion to grant bail is displaced. Finding no basis to disturb that decision, the court dismissed the revision. The judgment is a useful illustration of the operation of section 41B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 in relation to an enhanced-penalty charge under section 39C, and of the legislative policy of withholding bail for the more serious drug offences.

Was bail available for the enhanced-penalty charge under section 39C?

No. The court held that because the penalty under section 39C(1) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 exposed the applicant to imprisonment of more than five years, the offence fell within the category for which section 41B withholds bail, so the Sessions Court's refusal of bail was consistent with section 41B and the revision was dismissed.

What legislative purpose did the court rely on?

The court relied on the scheme and purpose of section 41B, including the Minister's statement that in cases punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than five years bail should not be granted, and held that section 41B applied to the section 39C charge accordingly.

Statutes Cited

Federal Constitution
Art 5(1)
Penal Code (Cap 574)

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)
[1982] 2 MLJ 119 [1991] 2 MLJ 186 [1993] 1 MLJ 177 [2020] MLJU 918

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-43-24-07-2025)