PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) VIJAYAN A/L MUNIANDY 2. ) SARASPATHY A/P ELHUMALAY 3. ) NOOR AZLINDA BINTI ZAINUDDIN 4. ) MAULANA BIN HASHIM 5. ) MUAAZ BIN HASHIM 6. ) GANAPRAKASH A/L VIJAYAN PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN SIVAPAKIAM A/P RAMASAMY

ba-29ncc-2027-08-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 May 2025 • BA-29NCC-2027-08/2022

Catchwords

Bankryptcy - Appeal to Judge in Chambers - Setting Aside Bankruptcy Notice - Whether the Bankruptcy Notice is fatally defective due to the incorrect judgement date - Whether the existence of pending appellate proceedings renders the judgement debt disputed - Whether the appellate are entitled to enforce the judgement debt independently of other co-judgment creaditors - Rule 95 Insolvency Rules 2017

Practice Areas

Bankryptcy

Judges (1)

Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran Delivered

Parties (7)

Ganaprakash a/l Vijayan Judgment Creditor Maulana bin Hashim Judgment Creditor Muaaz bin Hashim Judgment Creditor Noor Azlinda binti Zainuddin Judgment Creditor Saraspathy a/p Elhumalay Judgment Creditor Sivapakiam a/p Ramasamy Judgment Debtor Vijayan a/l Muniandy Judgment Creditor

Case Significance

PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) VIJAYAN A/L MUNIANDY 2. ) SARASPATHY A/P ELHUMALAY... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 5, 2025 (citation: ba-29ncc-2027-08-2022). The case was decided by Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran.

What was the outcome of PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) VIJAYAN A/L MUNIANDY 2. ) SARASPATHY A/P ELHUMALAY...?

PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) VIJAYAN A/L MUNIANDY 2. ) SARASPATHY A/P ELHUMALAY... is a High Court decision dated May 5, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran. See the full judgment for details.