N. CHANTHIRAN A/L NAGAPPAN v SINONG SEPADU SDN. BHD. [Sebelum ini dikenali sebagai KUB Sepadu Sdn. Bhd.]

ba-28pw-91-04-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 December 2025 • BA-28PW-91-04/2024

Catchwords

Posit Winding Up Application - Whether a former liquidator may invoke Section 487(3) of Companies Act 2016 after the winding up has been set aside - Whether declaratory relief may be granted in an application commenced by Notice of Motion under section 487(3) of Companies Act 2016 - Whether the declarations sought serve any practical purpose - Whether the Court can summarily determine the lawfulness of the transfers made - Whether the Court can determine fair and reasonable remuneration in this application. – Section 41 Specific Relief Act 1950 – Requirement of viva voce evidence, cross-examination, documentary discovery, and the full processes of a civil trial - The absence of a Committee of Inspection, a creditor resolution, or a court application under s 479(2) cannot be cured by inviting the Court to approve remuneration retrospectively under s 487(3) Companies Act 2016.

Practice Areas

Company Law Remedies

Judges (1)

Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran Delivered

Parties (2)

SINONG SEPADU Sdn Bhd Respondent N. Chanthiran a/l Nagappan Applicant

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-28pw-91-04-2024)