1. ) Jaganathan A/l Malayappan 2. ) VIJAN A/L MARIAPPAN 3. ) VIJAYAGOMARAN A/L MARIAPPAN 4. ) SUSHILAR A/P RAMAN 5. ) GURUSAMY A/L VELLASAMY (DIWAKILI OLEH SHEKAR A/L GURUSAMY) 6. ) PALANIAMMAL A/P PERUMAL (DIWAKILI OLEH SHEKAR A/L GURUSAMY) 7. ) S. PRAKASH A/L P. SHANGAN 8. ) THIRUNAVUKKARASU A/L SAMIAPPAN 9. ) GANESAN A/L PITCHAN 10. ) SINNAMMAH A/P MARIAPPAN 11. ) SUBRAMANIAM A/L KRISHNASAMY 12. ) SIVA KUMAR A/L PONNIAH v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Klang 2. ) GOH SWEE SWAN (SEBAGAI PEMEGA...

ba-24ncvc-2403-10-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 April 2026 • BA-24NCvC-2403-10/2025 • 24 min read
3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Outcome

Therefore, the Plaintiffs claim is allowed with cost.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ba-24ncvc-2403-10-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (14)

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)
[1937] 1 MLJ 229 [1969] 2 MLJ 3 [2023] 6 MLJ 840

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-2403-10-2025)