1. ) GAN PECK ENG 2. ) GAN KIAN TECK 3. ) GAN KIEN POH 4. ) YONG HONG HING 5. ) ANG LEW @ ANG SHEW KEK v 1. ) GAN CHAI THIAM 2. ) GAN CHAI JOO 3. ) GAN SUH CHIN 4. ) GAN SUH WEI 5. ) TAN SOOT CHU 6. ) YONG LING YING 7. ) CAPAIAN CERGAS SDN BHD
Catchwords
1. This is the Court’s decision in respect of Enclosure 36, delivered on 27 August 2025. Enclosure 36 concerns the Defendants’ Notice of Application to set aside the Injunction Orders previously granted by this Court in Enclosures 20 and 38. 2. Dissatisfied with this Court’s decision, the Defendants filed a Notice of Appeal in Enclosure 92 on 30 September 2025. 3. These are the grounds of judgment pertaining to Enclosure 36. Underlying Issue 4. The primary issue in respect of Enclosure 36 is whether the Defendants have succeeded in establishing that exceptional circumstances exist, namely, that the Order made by this Court was null and void on grounds of illegality, lack of jurisdiction, or breach of natural justice
Practice Areas
1. This is the Court’s decision in respect of Enclosure 36, delivered on 27 August 2025. Enclosure 36 concerns the Defendants’ Notice of Application to set aside the Injunction Orders previously granted by this Court in Enclosures 20 and 38. 2. Dissatisfied with this Court’s decision, the Defendants filed a Notice of Appeal in Enclosure 92 on 30 September 2025. 3. These are the grounds of judgment pertaining to Enclosure 36. Underlying Issue 4. The primary issue in respect of Enclosure 36 is whether the Defendants have succeeded in establishing that exceptional circumstances exist, namely, that the Order made by this Court was null and void on grounds of illegality, lack of jurisdiction, or breach of natural justice
Judges (1)
Parties (12)
CAPAIAN CERGAS Sdn Bhd Respondent Ang Lew @ Ang Shew Kek Applicant Gan Chai Joo Respondent Gan Chai Thiam Respondent Gan Kian Teck Applicant Gan Kien Poh Applicant Gan Peck Eng Applicant Gan Suh Chin Respondent Gan Suh Wei Respondent Tan Soot Chu Respondent Yong Hong Hing Applicant Yong Ling Ying Respondent
Case Significance
1. ) GAN PECK ENG 2. ) GAN KIAN TECK 3. ) GAN KIEN POH 4. ) YONG HONG HING 5.... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 26, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncc-39-04-2025). The case was decided by Choong Yeow Choy.
Key issues: 2. Dissatisfied with this Court’s decision, the Defendants filed a Notice of Appeal in Enclosure 92 on 30 September 2025..
What was the outcome of 1. ) GAN PECK ENG 2. ) GAN KIAN TECK 3. ) GAN KIEN POH 4. ) YONG HONG HING 5....?
1. ) GAN PECK ENG 2. ) GAN KIAN TECK 3. ) GAN KIEN POH 4. ) YONG HONG HING 5.... is a High Court decision dated August 26, 2025. The case was heard by Choong Yeow Choy. See the full judgment for details.