NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD

ba-24c-55-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 July 2025 • BA-24C-55-12/2024

Catchwords

This action originated from an Adjudication Decision (AD) made by the appointed adjudicator. The AD was in favour of the Plaintiff as the sub-contractor against the main contractor. Since the main contractor did not pay the adjudication amount to the Plaintiff in accordance to the AD, the Plaintiff made a written request to the Defendant, being the principal to the main contractor for direct payment to be made pursuant to Section 30 of the Construction Industry Payment Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA 2012).

Practice Areas

This action originated from an Adjudication Decision (AD) made by the appointed adjudicator. The AD was in favour of the Plaintiff as the sub-contractor against the main contractor. Since the main contractor did not pay the adjudication amount to the Plaintiff in accordance to the AD, the Plaintiff made a written request to the Defendant, being the principal to the main contractor for direct payment to be made pursuant to Section 30 of the Construction Industry Payment Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA 2012).

Judges (1)

Sumathi a/p Murugiah Delivered

Parties (2)

SLOB Sdn Bhd Respondent Nazrin Shahnaz binti Peer Mohamed Applicant

Case Significance

NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 28, 2025 (citation: ba-24c-55-12-2024). The case was decided by Sumathi a/p Murugiah.

Key issues: This action originated from an Adjudication Decision (AD) made by the appointed adjudicator. The AD was in favour of the Plaintiff as the sub-contractor against the main contractor..

What was the outcome of NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD?

NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated July 28, 2025. The case was heard by Sumathi a/p Murugiah. See the full judgment for details.