MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD v Kemas Maju Construction Sdn Bhd
Catchwords
The Adjudicator had failed to act impartially and independently and that the Adjudicator had acted in excess of his jurisdiction respectively in arriving to his conclusion of the Adjudication Proceedings. Kemas Maju has failed to establish Section 15(b) of the CIPAA 2012. No ambiguity in relation to the due dates of the payments claimed by Master Craft. Kemas Maju did not deny that at the time the Payment Claim was issued, all the payment invoices were already due for payment.
Practice Areas
The Adjudicator had failed to act impartially and independently and that the Adjudicator had acted in excess of his jurisdiction respectively in arriving to his conclusion of the Adjudication Proceedings. Kemas Maju has failed to establish Section 15(b) of the CIPAA 2012. No ambiguity in relation to the due dates of the payments claimed by Master Craft. Kemas Maju did not deny that at the time the Payment Claim was issued, all the payment invoices were already due for payment.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD v Kemas Maju Construction Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 23, 2025 (citation: ba-24c-1-01-2025). The case was decided by Sumathi a/p Murugiah.
Key issues: Kemas Maju has failed to establish Section 15(b) of the CIPAA 2012..
What was the outcome of MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD v Kemas Maju Construction Sdn Bhd?
MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD v Kemas Maju Construction Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated March 23, 2025. The case was heard by Sumathi a/p Murugiah. See the full judgment for details.