1. ) MOHD HAFIS BIN MOHD NASIR 2. ) NURUL IZZATY BINTI ROSLAN v 1. ) ZAHARUDIN BIN OTHMAN 2. ) AZHANI BINTI AZMAN

Case Significance

1. ) MOHD HAFIS BIN MOHD NASIR 2. ) NURUL IZZATY BINTI ROSLAN v 1. ) ZAHARUDI... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated December 7, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-353-08-2025). <p>Purchasers of a terrace house sought to enforce an SPA after the developer was dissolved, but the vendors counterclaimed for a declaration that the SPA was void, termination, removal of caveat, and arrears of rental. The High Court allowed the vendors' summary judgment application, finding the purchasers had breached the early vacant possession and tenancy arrangement by failing to pay monthly rental and by carrying out renovations without local authority approval.</p> The case was decided by Seow Hock Peng. Counsel appearing: Abdul Qadir Sirry-Yus-Saqti Aros (counsel for plaintiff), Rosnida Che Ibrahim (counsel for defendant), Rozima Mohd Fajar Ali (counsel for defendant), Shahabudin Shaik Alaudin (counsel for defendant).