ONG KWEE LEE v ABLE PERFECT SDN BHD
Outcome
As such, this Court hereby makes the following orders: (i) The appeal is allowed; (ii) The High Court’s Order dated 28.10.2022 is hereby set aside. Consequently, the respondent’s claim (the plaintiff’s claim) is dismissed, and the appellant’s counterclaim (the defendant’s counterclaim) is allowed, and the orders are as follows: (a) The appellant is to pay the respondent the sum of RM3,563,521.68 (as at 22.6.
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (3)
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
Illustrates how the court reconciles a beneficiary's interest in shares held on trust with the obligation to pay the agreed share of the acquisition cost, recognising the beneficial interest but releasing the trust property to the beneficiary only net of the balance he still owes with interest.
This Court of Appeal decision concerns a dispute over the beneficial ownership of shares held on trust, and whether a beneficiary who has not paid his full share of the acquisition cost may nonetheless claim the shares and their dividends. The contest was whether the appellant was a beneficiary of 250,000 shares in a company, and whether he had breached a Trust Deed dated 11 April 2016 in the mode of payment towards acquiring those shares, which had been registered in the name of the respondent. A related question was whether the appellant was entitled to enjoy the benefit of the dividends on the shares immediately, despite not having paid the full amount of his portion of the shared acquisition costs to the respondent.
The Court of Appeal analysed the Trust Deed and the parties' respective obligations under it, treating the arrangement as one in which the respondent held the shares for the appellant's benefit subject to the appellant meeting his agreed contribution to the acquisition cost. On that analysis the appellant's beneficial interest was recognised, but his entitlement to the shares and their fruits was conditioned on his discharging the outstanding balance, together with interest, rather than being immediate and unconditional.
The Court of Appeal made orders giving effect to that position: the appellant was liable to pay interest at five per cent per annum on the judgment sum calculated from 22 June 2022 until full settlement; the sum of RM12,485,514.32 held by the respondent's solicitors as stakeholder, together with interest earned, was to be released to the appellant after deducting the payments due to the respondent, with the deducted sums released to the respondent, all within one month; and costs of RM50,000 were awarded to the appellant here and below. The judgment illustrates how the court reconciles a beneficiary's interest in shares held on trust with his obligation to pay his agreed share of the acquisition cost, releasing the trust property to him net of what he still owes.
Summary
The appellant claimed beneficial ownership of 250,000 shares in Sekoplas Industries held on trust by the respondent company, arguing that his portion of the acquisition costs could be offset against dividends from the shares. The Court of Appeal reversed the High Court, finding that the Trust Deed clearly established a trust and the dividends should offset the appellant's outstanding costs. The appellant was ordered to pay the remaining balance of RM3,563,521.68 and the RM12.48 million held by stakeholder solicitors was ordered released to him after deduction.
What was the dispute about?
Whether the appellant was a beneficiary of 250,000 shares registered in the respondent's name, whether he had breached the Trust Deed of 11 April 2016 in the mode of paying for them, and whether he could enjoy the dividends immediately despite not having paid his full share of the acquisition cost.
How did the court reconcile the competing positions?
It recognised the appellant's beneficial interest under the trust but conditioned his entitlement to the shares and their fruits on his paying the outstanding balance with interest, rather than treating his entitlement as immediate and unconditional.
What orders were made?
The appellant was to pay five per cent interest on the judgment sum from 22 June 2022; the RM12,485,514.32 held by the respondent's solicitors as stakeholder was to be released to the appellant after deducting the sums due to the respondent; and costs of RM50,000 were awarded to the appellant here and below.
Cases Cited (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (b-02ncvcw-2083-11-2022)