KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA BERHAD v IMEJ PARKING SDN BHD

b-02ncvcw-1190-07-2023 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 4 February 2025 • B-02(NCvC)(W)-1190-07/2023 • 21 min read

1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Breach of Contract - claim for excess payment of parking rental - whether correct method of calculation used - Claim for loss of profit due to parking bays without license - Duty to obtain certificate of fitness under Factories and Machineries Act 1967 - Whether duty owner of building or company operating parking space - Section 3, Section 19, Section 21, Section 40(3), Section 50 Factories and Machineries Act 1967 - Regulation 10 of the Factories and Machinery (Notification, Certification of Fitness and Inspection) Regulations 1970.

Practice Areas

Breach of Contract

Judges (3)

Ahmad Fairuz bin Zainol Abidin Delivered Lim Chong Fong Coram Supang Lian Coram

Counsel (5)

Hisham Sobri & Kadir Firm Mohaji Hazury & Ismail Firm Alif Ridhwan bin Mohd Yusof Counsel Appellant Mohaji bin Selamat Counsel Respondent Mohamad Izzuddin bin Jamalludin Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

IMEJ PARKING Sdn Bhd Respondent KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA BERHAD Appellant

Case Significance

KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA BERHAD v IMEJ PARKING SDN BHD is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated February 4, 2025 (citation: b-02ncvcw-1190-07-2023). <p>Koperasi Permodalan Felda and Imej Parking filed cross-appeals arising from a parking management contract dispute at Southgate Commercial Centre. The Court of Appeal allowed Koperasi Felda's appeal and dismissed Imej Parking's appeal, finding no appealable errors in the High Court's findings on the correct rental calculation method, the duty to obtain certificates of fitness under the Factories and Machineries Act 1967, and the computation of losses.</p> The panel comprised Ahmad Fairuz bin Zainol Abidin, Lim Chong Fong and Supang Lian, with Ahmad Fairuz bin Zainol Abidin delivering the judgment. Counsel appearing: Alif Ridhwan bin Mohd Yusof (counsel for appellant), Mohaji bin Selamat (counsel for respondent), Mohamad Izzuddin bin Jamalludin (counsel for appellant).

Summary

Koperasi Permodalan Felda and Imej Parking filed cross-appeals arising from a parking management contract dispute at Southgate Commercial Centre. The Court of Appeal allowed Koperasi Felda's appeal and dismissed Imej Parking's appeal, finding no appealable errors in the High Court's findings on the correct rental calculation method, the duty to obtain certificates of fitness under the Factories and Machineries Act 1967, and the computation of losses.

What was the outcome of KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA BERHAD v IMEJ PARKING SDN BHD?

<p>Koperasi Permodalan Felda and Imej Parking filed cross-appeals arising from a parking management contract dispute at Southgate Commercial Centre. T...

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)

[2020] MLJU 1469