Pendakwa Raya [Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM)] v Mohd Aman Bin Mustapa

ab-41ha-3-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 4 June 2025 • AB-41H(A)-3-12/2023

Catchwords

Criminal Procedure - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Offence under s.385 of the Penal Code - Putting fear in order to commit extortion - Fear of sex videos made by the complainants would be reported to the Pejabat Agama - Whether the Sessions Court Judge had erred in law and in fact when convicting the accused - Credibility of prosecution witnesses - Whether ingredients of the charge have been proved - No judicial misappreciation by Sessions Court Judge - Appeal against conviction dismissed - Accused was a policeman entrusted with security and safety of the public - Sentence of imprisonment increased from 3 years to 5 years

Practice Areas

Criminal Procedure

Judges (1)

Noor Ruwena binti Md. Nurdin Delivered

Parties (2)

Pendakwa Raya Appellant Mohd Aman bin Mustapa Respondent

Case Significance

Pendakwa Raya [Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM)] v Mohd Aman Bin Mustapa is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 4, 2025 (citation: ab-41ha-3-12-2023). The case was decided by Noor Ruwena binti Md. Nurdin.

What was the outcome of Pendakwa Raya [Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM)] v Mohd Aman Bin Mustapa?

Pendakwa Raya [Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM)] v Mohd Aman Bin Mustapa is a High Court decision dated June 4, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Ruwena binti Md. Nurdin. See the full judgment for details.