ANNIE VIJAYA A/P KANDIAH PETER v PRABAKARAN A/L KRISHNAN

aa-24f-63-09-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 April 2022 • AA-24F-63-09/2020 • 9 min read
3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Outcome

Accordingly, the Respondent’s Stay Application is dismissed. The Respondent is reminded that compliance with court orders is not optional and that failure to do so will attract serious legal consequences. [26] This Court emphasizes the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that judicial decisions are respected and enforced.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (aa-24f-63-09-2020). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

FAMILY LAW: Section 88 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976-Custody for a child-Welfare of the child-Section 89 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976-Accesss of the child- Section 77 and 78 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976- Maintenance of the spouse and child of the marriage.

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Abdul Wahab bin Mohamed Delivered

Counsel (4)

Al Murali & Co Firm Chan & Associates Firm Murali a/l Puranachandran Counsel Applicant Robin Lim Fang Say Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Annie Vijaya a/p Kandiah Peter Applicant Prabakaran a/l Krishnan Respondent

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)
[1953] 1 MLRH 690 [1992] 1 MLJ 201 [2013] 5 CLJ 461

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (aa-24f-63-09-2020)