Blue Valley Plantation Berhad v 1. ) Ganesan a/l Ramasamy 2. ) Balakrishnan A/l Kaliannan 3. ) Phylon Range Sdn Bhd

aa-22ncvc-50-06-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 September 2025 • AA-22NCvC-50-06/2022

Catchwords

COMPANY LAW: Shares – Transfer of shares – Whether Defendant acquired 50,000 shares – Whether Form 32A sufficient without registration – Consideration – Consent order premised on alleged shareholding – Whether Defendant gave valid consideration – Whether consent orders based on mistake or fraud – Restitution – Unjust enrichment CIVIL PROCEDURE: Consent judgments – Setting aside – Total failure of consideration – Whether consent orders vitiated by mistake or fraud – Whether rescission warranted COSTS: Party and party costs – Whether award against non-party justified – Whether 2nd Defendant properly named in counterclaim – Not a non-party costs scenario

Practice Areas

COMPANY LAW: Shares

Judges (1)

Moses Susayan Delivered

Parties (4)

Blue Valley Plantation Berhad Plaintiff Phylon Range Sdn Bhd Defendant Balakrishnan a/l Kaliannan Defendant Ganesan a/l Ramasamy Defendant

Case Significance

Blue Valley Plantation Berhad v 1. ) Ganesan a/l Ramasamy 2. ) Balakrishnan A... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 11, 2025 (citation: aa-22ncvc-50-06-2022). The case was decided by Moses Susayan.

What was the outcome of Blue Valley Plantation Berhad v 1. ) Ganesan a/l Ramasamy 2. ) Balakrishnan A...?

Blue Valley Plantation Berhad v 1. ) Ganesan a/l Ramasamy 2. ) Balakrishnan A... is a High Court decision dated September 11, 2025. The case was heard by Moses Susayan. See the full judgment for details.