Pendakwa Raya v KANNAN A/L LETCHUMANAN

a-09-133-05-2024 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 16 June 2025 • A-09-133-05/2024 • 30 min read
10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (5)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Pendakwa Raya v KANNAN A/L LETCHUMANAN is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated June 16, 2025 (citation: a-09-133-05-2024). <p>The Public Prosecutor appealed the High Court's acquittal of the respondent who was convicted by the Magistrate's Court of driving with excess alcohol under section 45A(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987. The High Court had wrongly held that it was mandatory for the police to request two additional specimens of breath under section 45C(1) RTA after the initial breath test. The Court of Appeal set aside the acquittal, restored the conviction, substituted the 14-day imprisonment with one day's i The panel comprised Ahmad Zaidi bin Ibrahim, Azmi bin Ariffin and Faizah binti Jamaludin, with Faizah binti Jamaludin delivering the judgment. Counsel appearing: Kaladevi A/P Chandrasekaran (counsel for respondent), Mohd Fairuz Bin Johari (counsel for appellant), Shivdev Singh (counsel for respondent).

Summary

The Public Prosecutor appealed the High Court's acquittal of the respondent who was convicted by the Magistrate's Court of driving with excess alcohol under section 45A(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987. The High Court had wrongly held that it was mandatory for the police to request two additional specimens of breath under section 45C(1) RTA after the initial breath test. The Court of Appeal set aside the acquittal, restored the conviction, substituted the 14-day imprisonment with one day's imprisonment, and increased the fine to RM15,000.

What was the outcome of Pendakwa Raya v KANNAN A/L LETCHUMANAN?

<p>The Public Prosecutor appealed the High Court's acquittal of the respondent who was convicted by the Magistrate's Court of driving with excess alco...

Statutes Cited

Interpretation Act
s 17A
Interpretation Acts requires that the long title and preamble and every schedule to an Act shall be construed and have effect as part of the Act
s 15
Interpretation Acts to take notice of the division into parts or chapters of an Act
s 16

Cases Cited (10)

UK (1)
[2001] 2 AC 349
MY (9)
[2020] 4 MLJ 721 [2020] 5 AMR 579 [2020] 7 CLJ 561 [2021] 1 MLJ 478 [2021] 6 MLJ 348 [2021] 8 CLJ 409 [2022] 1 AMR 617 [2022] 1 CLJ 331 [2022] 1 MLJ 778