XXXX v XXXX

22ncvc-477-09-2015 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 June 2025 • 22NCVC-477-09/2015

Catchwords

Assessment of damages following the Federal Court’s ruling that the defendant breached three contracts by failing to order the mandatory minimum of 250,000 battery grid panels per month. Rejecting the defendant’s expert methodology based on gross profit margins, the Court held that damages must reflect the contractually agreed conversion costs which constituted the plaintiff’s true compensation parameters given the exclusivity obligations and sunk investments. Damages were quantified at RM1,963,132.65 with additional orders for interest, expert fees and costs, reaffirming the principle that damages should restore the plaintiff to its contractual position.

Practice Areas

Assessment of damages following the Federal Court’s ruling that the defendant breached three contracts by failing to order the mandatory minimum of 250,000 battery grid panels per month. Rejecting the defendant’s expert methodology based on gross profit margins, the Court held that damages must reflect the contractually agreed conversion costs which constituted the plaintiff’s true compensation parameters given the exclusivity obligations and sunk investments. Damages were quantified at RM1,963,132.65 with additional orders for interest, expert fees and costs, reaffirming the principle that damages should restore the plaintiff to its contractual position.

Judges (1)

Ahmad Shahrir b. Mohd Salleh Delivered

Parties (2)

Xxxx Defendant Xxxx Plaintiff

Case Significance

XXXX v XXXX is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 18, 2025 (citation: 22ncvc-477-09-2015). The case was decided by Ahmad Shahrir b. Mohd Salleh.

What was the outcome of XXXX v XXXX?

XXXX v XXXX is a High Court decision dated June 18, 2025. The case was heard by Ahmad Shahrir b. Mohd Salleh. See the full judgment for details.