1. ) FAZLI BIN SUBOH 2. ) UMI AL-KHAIR FATIMAH BINTI IDRIS 3. ) NUR DAMIA LUTFIAH BINTI FAZLI (SEORANG BUDAK MELALUI FAZLI BIN SUBOH BAPA DAN SAHABAT WAKILNYA) v 1. ) DR. FATIMAH BT AHMAD FAUZI 2. ) DR. VIJAYAN MUNUSAMY 3. ) PENGARAH HOSPITAL KUALA LUMPUR 4. ) KEMENTERIAN KESIHATAN MALAYSIA 5. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

21ncvc-88-12-2015 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 June 2025 • 21NCVC-88-12/2015

Catchwords

Whether O. 59, r. 16 or O. 59, r. 17 of the RC 2012 should apply - Whether the amount stated in the Bill of Costs was reasonable

Practice Areas

Whether O. 59, r. 16 or O. 59, r. 17 of the RC 2012 should apply

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Parties (8)

KEMENTERIAN KESIHATAN MALAYSIA Defendant Kerajaan Malaysia Defendant PENGARAH HOSPITAL KUALA LUMPUR Defendant Dr. Fatimah bt Ahmad Fauzi Defendant Dr. Vijayan Munusamy Defendant Fazli bin Suboh Plaintiff Nur Damia Lutfiah binti Fazli Plaintiff Umi Al-khair Fatimah binti Idris Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) FAZLI BIN SUBOH 2. ) UMI AL-KHAIR FATIMAH BINTI IDRIS 3. ) NUR DAMIA LUT... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 23, 2025 (citation: 21ncvc-88-12-2015). The case was decided by Aliza binti Sulaiman.

Key issues: Whether O. 59, r. 16 or O. 59, r. 17 of the RC 2012 should apply - Whether the amount stated in the Bill of Costs was reasonable.

What was the outcome of 1. ) FAZLI BIN SUBOH 2. ) UMI AL-KHAIR FATIMAH BINTI IDRIS 3. ) NUR DAMIA LUT...?

1. ) FAZLI BIN SUBOH 2. ) UMI AL-KHAIR FATIMAH BINTI IDRIS 3. ) NUR DAMIA LUT... is a High Court decision dated June 23, 2025. The case was heard by Aliza binti Sulaiman. See the full judgment for details.