1. ) MENTERI KEWANGAN 2. ) MENTERI PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI 3. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN KASTAM DIRAJA MALAYSIA 4. ) Kerajaan Malaysia v DILER DEMIR CELIK ENDUSTRU VE TICARET A.S. ALSO KNOWN AS DILER IRON AND STEEL CO. INC.
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
1. ) MENTERI KEWANGAN 2. ) MENTERI PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI 3. )... is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated April 14, 2025 (citation: 01f-8-03-2024w). <p>The Malaysian Government appealed the Court of Appeal's decision in favour of a Turkish steel company challenging anti-dumping duties on concrete reinforcing bar imports. The Federal Court addressed questions on constructed export price, related party transactions, and duty drawback adjustments under the Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties Act 1993. The appeal was unanimously allowed with anti-dumping duties reinstated, as the respondent failed to demonstrate that duty drawback differences The panel comprised Abu Bakar bin Jais, Nordin bin Hassan and Zabariah binti Mohd Yusof, with Zabariah binti Mohd Yusof delivering the judgment. Counsel appearing: Rahazlan Affandi bin Abdul Rahim (counsel for appellant), Siti Naquiah binti Mohd Jamel (counsel for appellant).
Summary
The Malaysian Government appealed the Court of Appeal's decision in favour of a Turkish steel company challenging anti-dumping duties on concrete reinforcing bar imports. The Federal Court addressed questions on constructed export price, related party transactions, and duty drawback adjustments under the Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties Act 1993. The appeal was unanimously allowed with anti-dumping duties reinstated, as the respondent failed to demonstrate that duty drawback differences affected price comparability.
What was the outcome of 1. ) MENTERI KEWANGAN 2. ) MENTERI PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI 3. )...?
<p>The Malaysian Government appealed the Court of Appeal's decision in favour of a Turkish steel company challenging anti-dumping duties on concrete r...